#11339 closed enhancement (fixed)
[PATCH] Add "storage_tank" preset (100,000 uses in database)
| Reported by: | brycenesbitt | Owned by: | team |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | minor | Milestone: | 15.05 |
| Component: | Internal preset | Version: | |
| Keywords: | Cc: | Klumbumbus |
Description (last modified by )
I've missed having an easy preset for a tank.
With 100,000 uses in the database, man_made=storage_tank seems like a winner, here's a preset.
I reused an old icon, I think that's OK here.
The German tagging wiki page recommends building=yes, and I followed that convention here.
Attachments (4)
Change History (25)
by , 11 years ago
| Attachment: | preset_storage_tank.diff added |
|---|
comment:1 by , 11 years ago
| Description: | modified (diff) |
|---|
comment:2 by , 11 years ago
| Milestone: | → 15.05 |
|---|
follow-up: 15 comment:3 by , 11 years ago
comment:4 by , 11 years ago
I think that building=storage_tank would be much better for a storage tank.
follow-up: 6 comment:5 by , 11 years ago
How about the icon ? I fear that using the same icon for storage_tank and water_tower will disguise the differences.
@stoecker:
Thought, I did already comment around ten days ago. Did I really miss the submit button or was there a problem with the server/database ?
comment:6 by , 11 years ago
Hello,
Thought, I did already comment around ten days ago. Did I really miss the submit button or was there a problem with the server/database ?
No database issues known to me. Everything exceptionally stable.
comment:7 by , 11 years ago
@skyper I agree "content=*" should be there.
Tag numbers indicate that "building" can be left off completely:
114 050 man_made=storage_tank
7,282 building=storage_tank
804 man_made=fuel_storage_tank
643 building=storage tank
260 building:type=storage_tank
159 man_made=storage_tank;tower
135 building=fluid_storage_tank
70 note man_made=storage_tank are not yet (2013-01-11) rendered
In rendering for osm-carto perhaps the icon needs to be different, but not in JOSM editing where the tag name is shown.
comment:9 by , 11 years ago
| Cc: | added |
|---|
comment:10 by , 11 years ago
I'm happy that storage_tank is being added. But why both man_made= and building=? Haven't the users decide on man_made via using it in majority?
comment:11 by , 11 years ago
@aceman I think it's largely a rendering hack. man_made=storage_tank is more semantic. But German mappers found that adding building=yes makes it render nice for areas, and documented that on the wiki.
"Don't tag for the rendering" might be a mantra among experienced users, but with osm-carto rendering lagging so far behind tagging behavior, it's not reality.
building=storage_tank + man_made=storage_tank seems a reasonable compromise.
comment:12 by , 11 years ago
building=storage_tank in my opinion is not an incorrect tag to describe structures like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Storage_tank#/media/File:Fuel_tank_gnangarra.jpg - therefore IMHO it is not a tagging for renderer.
It is widely accepted that storage tanks should be described as man_made=storage_tank - but it does not mean that using also building=storage_tank is incorrect
| man_made=storage_tank | man_made=water_tower | aeroway=terminal | (amenity=place_of_worship && !building=no) <many many many more>])). |
comment:15 by , 11 years ago
follow-up: 17 comment:16 by , 11 years ago
@skyper could you use http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:material to avoid confusion with contents?
At this point I feel building should be mandatory. In the rare case (of an underground tank?) the mapper can just delete the extra tag.
comment:17 by , 11 years ago
Replying to brycenesbitt:
@skyper could you use osmwiki:Key:building:material to avoid confusion with contents?
At this point I feel building should be mandatory. In the rare case (of an underground tank?) the mapper can just delete the extra tag.
Still not happy with building=* but not the right time to discuss. See optional patch version 2.
follow-up: 21 comment:18 by , 11 years ago
If we're designing tagging (rather than providing presets for existing use) then we should also get open top vs. closed top into there.
comment:19 by , 11 years ago
If we skip (the useless value) capacity=unknown, then capacity is used only 22 times on man_made=storage_tank. (http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/9pc). For man_made=water_tower water_tower:volume is used even more then capacity. capacity wiki page does not mention man_made=* It seems there is no clear established tagging scheme so far.
comment:21 by , 11 years ago
Replying to brycenesbitt:
If we're designing tagging (rather than providing presets for existing use)
The Guidelines at DevelopersGuide/DefaultPresets didn't change.



How about adding
capacity=*andmaterial=*?I would not set
building=yeswithout an option to change manually. In my eyes, a "combo" with default set to "yes" would be better.