#11294 closed enhancement (fixed)
add descriptins for leaf_cycle (was: copy texts from wiki, license problems)
Reported by: | Klumbumbus | Owned by: | team |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 15.04 |
Component: | Internal preset | Version: | |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description (last modified by )
I would like to add the descriptions of the values of Key:leaf_cycle from the wiki (since semi_evergreen and semi_deciduous are not self-explaning). However this seems not allowed, because of the cc-by-sa 2.0 license of the wikitexts. Would it be enough, if we add the text Parts of the texts used in presets taken from the osm wiki http://wiki.openstreetmap.org CC BY-SA 2.0
(or similar) to the contributors or license tab of the about window?
Revision: 8164 Repository Root: http://josm.openstreetmap.de/svn Relative URL: ^/trunk Last Changed Author: Klumbumbus Last Changed Date: 2015-04-01 22:08:50 +0200 (Wed, 01 Apr 2015) Build-Date: 2015-04-02 01:31:01 URL: http://josm.openstreetmap.de/svn/trunk Repository UUID: 0c6e7542-c601-0410-84e7-c038aed88b3b Last Changed Rev: 8164 Identification: JOSM/1.5 (8164 de) Windows 7 32-Bit Memory Usage: 459 MB / 742 MB (105 MB allocated, but free) Java version: 1.8.0_31, Oracle Corporation, Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM VM arguments: [-Djava.security.manager, -Djava.security.policy=file:C:\Program Files\Java\jre1.8.0_31\lib\security\javaws.policy, -DtrustProxy=true, -Djnlpx.home=<java.home>\bin, -Djnlpx.origFilenameArg=C:\Program Files\josm-latest.jnlp, -Djnlpx.remove=false, -Djava.util.Arrays.useLegacyMergeSort=true, -Djnlpx.heapsize=256m,768m, -Djnlpx.splashport=55320, -Djnlpx.jvm=<java.home>\bin\javaw.exe, -Djnlpx.vmargs=LURqYXZhLnV0aWwuQXJyYXlzLnVzZUxlZ2FjeU1lcmdlU29ydD10cnVlAA==] Program arguments: [--debug] Dataset consistency test: No problems found
Attachments (0)
Change History (4)
comment:1 by , 10 years ago
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|
follow-up: 4 comment:2 by , 10 years ago
comment:4 by , 10 years ago
Component: | Core → Internal preset |
---|---|
Keywords: | template_report removed |
Milestone: | → 15.04 |
Summary: | copy texts from wiki, license problems → add descriptins for leaf_cycle (was: copy texts from wiki, license problems) |
Replying to stoecker:
I doubt that that small text parts have enough individuality that a license can cover them at all. I'd say simply copy them without any special handling. For all these licenses to work you need a minimum amount "art" (don't know English terms here). Otherwise it are simply words which can't be protected.
OK, sounds reasonable.
I doubt that that small text parts have enough individuality that a license can cover them at all. I'd say simply copy them without any special handling. For all these licenses to work you need a minimum amount "art" (don't know English terms here). Otherwise it are simply words which can't be protected.