#10831 closed enhancement (fixed)
refine crossing icons
| Reported by: | Klumbumbus | Owned by: | Klumbumbus |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 14.12 |
| Component: | Internal mappaint style | Version: | |
| Keywords: | Cc: |
Description (last modified by )
Currently every highway=crossing is represented by this zebra-crossing icon: 
Here is a refinement:
highway=crossing (default icon)
crossing=unmarked
crossing=island
crossing_ref=zebra
crossing=traffic_signals
Once #10217 is done, they can also be nicely aligned.
Attachments (1)
Change History (11)
comment:1 by , 11 years ago
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → closed |
comment:2 by , 11 years ago
There is a non-trivial amount of occurences where people put highway=traffic_signals (instead of =crosssing) together with crossing=* (http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/highway=traffic_signals#combinations), meaning there is a crossing for pedestrians and also a signal for cars on the same spot. Would it be possible to support that with icons? Today I think the icon for highway=traffic_signals overrides the crossing icon.
comment:3 by , 11 years ago
by , 11 years ago
| Attachment: | traffic-light_crossing2.png added |
|---|
comment:4 by , 11 years ago
Or do you mean also icons for all other combinations of highway=traffic_signals + crossing=*? Are there more valid combinations except highway=traffic_signals + crossing=traffic_signals?
follow-up: 6 comment:5 by , 11 years ago
Or we do always display
for crossing=traffic_signals (also with highway=traffic_signals), because every crossing traffic signal for pedestrians has also traffic signals for the motorized traffic. But not every junction with traffic signals for the motorized traffic has a crossing signal for pedestrians.
comment:6 by , 11 years ago
Replying to Klumbumbus:
Or we do always display
for
crossing=traffic_signals(also withhighway=traffic_signals), because every crossing traffic signal for pedestrians has also traffic signals for the motorized traffic. But not every junction with traffic signals for the motorized traffic has a crossing signal for pedestrians.
That is an interesting analysis. However the signals may be mapped as 2 nodes, one for crossing=traffic_signals (foot) and one for highway=traffic_signals (car). In that case, the foot crossing does not automatically imply there is also a car signal at the same spot (it would mean a duplicity with the second node). So I think we should display whatever the mapper tagged without any assumptions yet (those assumptions also aren't on the wiki).
So the icon https://josm.openstreetmap.de/raw-attachment/ticket/10831/traffic-light_crossing2.png
for "highway=traffic_signals+crossing=traffic_signals" would be nice. And a second variant for highway=traffic_signals+crossing=* (all other values except 'traffic_signals' and 'no')" . With a 3 light signal and maybe little zebra stripes at the side (from icon https://trac.openstreetmap.org/intertrac/source%3Asubversion/applications/share/map-icons/classic.small/vehicle/crossing_ref_zebra.svg%3Fformat%3Draw).
comment:9 by , 11 years ago
| Description: | modified (diff) |
|---|




In 7794/josm: