Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of Ticket #10490, comment 3


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2014-12-26T23:07:55+01:00 (11 years ago)
Author:
Klumbumbus

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #10490, comment 3

    v1 v2  
    1 Tracks are often on forests of aerial imagery, (also tracktypes are hard to distinguish at the moment). I tried to make them more visible by adjusting dashes and width, but I noticed that this is not enough. So I suggest a color change of tracks to brown. Brown instead of green for tracks is in general more logic (since the surface of the track is more often brown or grey instead of green) and better distinguishable from paths and steps. I attached two comparison gifs and the patch file.
     1Tracks are often on forests of aerial imagery and therefore hard to see, (also tracktypes are hard to distinguish at the moment). I tried to make them more visible by adjusting dashes and width, but I noticed that this is not enough. So I suggest a color change of tracks to brown. Brown instead of green for tracks is in general more logic (since the surface of the track is more often brown or grey instead of green) and better distinguishable from paths and steps. I attached two comparison gifs and the patch file.
    22
    33I would like to hear the opinions of the main developers (did I forget someone?) as this is some kind of a "big" change for the default mappaint style. I also tested this how it looks like with a desert aerial image background and I think that at least brown is not less visible than green there. It would be ok to delay this to the next milestone if there are any concerns.