#10224 closed enhancement (fixed)
New icon for amenity=charging_station
| Reported by: | Klumbumbus | Owned by: | team |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 14.07 |
| Component: | Internal mappaint style | Version: | |
| Keywords: | icon | Cc: | stoecker, akks, simon04 |
Description (last modified by )
Current icon for charging_station: 
That looks to me like a typical speed camera in germany (http://www.blitzer.de/system/pictures/files/2012/08/63047/normal_Blitzer_KL_7.jpg).
I made a new icon for amenity=charging_station: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Charging_station.png
Attachments (0)
Change History (12)
comment:1 by , 10 years ago
| Description: | modified (diff) |
|---|
comment:2 by , 10 years ago
comment:3 by , 10 years ago
In [o30515] - New icon for amenity=charging_station (license: CC0, author: Klumbumbus)
Thanks for the gentle reminder! ;)
comment:4 by , 10 years ago
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → closed |
follow-up: 6 comment:5 by , 10 years ago
What do we do with old XML style?
In my previous style update I also took care of updating it, should we continue to do so, or should we drop it now?
comment:6 by , 10 years ago
Replying to Don-vip:
What do we do with old XML style?
In my previous style update I also took care of updating it, should we continue to do so, or should we drop it now?
I would like to know this as well. I plan to add some shop icons soon.
comment:7 by , 10 years ago
I suggest that we drop official maintenance of the old xml style and move it to a wiki page. There is no reason to ship them both, unless there are any problems with the mapcss variant.
comment:8 by , 10 years ago
| Cc: | added |
|---|
Fine for me, what do the others think? Should we also convert other existing XML styles and finally completely drop XML support?
comment:9 by , 10 years ago
It's not really much to gain from dropping XML support right now: Both formats coexist nicely and you wouldn't save a lot in terms of download size. Converting the remaining XML styles is a good idea though, but I think some of them are external.
comment:10 by , 10 years ago
should we continue to do so, or should we drop it now
There is no reason to update the old style.
I suggest that we drop official maintenance of the old xml style and move it to a wiki page.
I think this is to early, but feel free to do so.
Should we also convert other existing XML styles
Possible.
drop XML support
No, there is no reason to do so and it will break external styles without any need.
comment:11 by , 10 years ago
| Milestone: | → 14.07 |
|---|
In 7292/josm: