#6461 closed defect (fixed)
update preset for contact information
| Reported by: | flaimo | Owned by: | christeck |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | minor | Component: | Internal preset |
| Version: | tested | Keywords: | |
| Cc: |
Description
according to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact the keys "phone", "fax", "website" and "email" should be grouped using the "contact:" namespace. the josm preset should be updated so it writes those keys instead the old ones without a namespace.
Attachments (0)
Change History (10)
comment:1 Changed 2 years ago by Claudius Henrichs <claudius.h@…>
comment:2 Changed 21 months ago by simon04
- Component changed from Core to Internal preset
- Owner changed from team to christeck
comment:3 Changed 20 months ago by simon04
We could add a preset "Contact (new)" containing the contact: tags. Doing so, we can assist the user independently of the tagging scheme being used.
comment:4 Changed 20 months ago by simon04
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from new to closed
In [4502/josm]:
comment:5 Changed 17 months ago by simon04
Note the discussion in the josm-dev mailing list: http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/josm-dev/2011-December/005877.html
comment:6 Changed 17 months ago by simon04
Following the discussion in the mailinglist, I'd rename the common/old scheme to "Contact (common schema)" to clarify the relation. Any comments/objections?
comment:7 Changed 17 months ago by bastiK
Maybe rename "Contact (new schema)" to "Contact (tagging schema with 'contact:*' prefix)"?
comment:8 Changed 17 months ago by simon04
Both renamings combined would make it very clear:
- Contact (common schema)
- Contact (schema with 'contact:*' prefix)
comment:9 Changed 16 months ago by stoecker
Sounds good to me.
comment:10 Changed 16 months ago by simon04
In [4790/josm]:



Although from a data design/computer science perspective the contact:-namespace would definitely be nicer you have to admit that the much more human-readable "phone"-tag is way more established (Taginfo.openstreetmap.org says 89.000 "phone" vs 9.000 "contact:phone"). It's fairly easy to change all instances to "contact:phone" in database preprocessing.
Conclusion: JOSM preset should stick with the established tagging scheme