Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #9390, comment 4


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2014-03-02T18:30:39+01:00 (10 years ago)
Author:
skyper

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Ticket #9390, comment 4

    initial v1  
    22> it depends how the admin boundary is defined, if it IS the waterway, then it is logical that refining the waterway will also automatically (and correctly) refine the boundary.
    33
    4 But overlapping ways are always an error. Either they are defined as the waterway and the waterway should be a member or they are defined seperately and should have their own ways which should not overlap. As JOSM allows to edit within millimetres it should not be a problem to have two ways right next to each other which will never be seen on any rendered map.
     4But overlapping ways are always an error. Either they are defined as the waterway and the waterway should be a member of the boundary relation or they are defined seperately and should have their own ways which should not overlap. As JOSM allows to edit within millimetres it should not be a problem to have two ways right next to each other which will never be seen on any rendered map.
     5
     6EDT: The major problem I have is that especially community borders are often mapped wrong (overlapping) and/or the sources are not good enough.