Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #9210, comment 15


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2014-04-03T07:24:33+02:00 (5 years ago)
Author:
stoecker
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #9210, comment 15

    initial v1  
    55Think of something like HOT. Should they wait weeks or months until LWG approves their imagery? Would make the project totally useless.
    66
    7 I anyway want to introduce a verfied="date" tag to our maps list, so outdated entries get easier to spot. If LWG wants, they can also provide a list of verified URL's and we simply add an lwg_approved="date" to the entries and display that to the user. But not more. If they do so - will LWG be liable for wrong entries? Now we tell the user always "you are responsible". A simple API list will not be enough in any case. It must be a more official document of the type "The LWG states:".
     7I anyway want to introduce a verfied="date" tag to our maps list, so outdated entries get easier to spot. If LWG wants, they can also provide a list of verified URL's and we simply add an lwg_approved="date" to the entries and display that to the user. But not more. If they do so - will LWG be liable for wrong entries: Now we tell the user always "you are responsible"? A simple API list will not be enough in any case. It must be a more official document of the type "The LWG states:".