| 4 | | +100 |
| | 4 | +100 -- to "Resolve using theirs" |
| | 5 | |
| | 6 | As stoecker points having an (easy) option (available to anyone, I would add) would undermine what the whole conflict resolution aims at. |
| | 7 | |
| | 8 | Having said that -- since there are enough many _and_ recurring real life cases where all of the server data should be over written I see a case for having such option for admins or some other "conflict resolution specialists". |
| | 9 | |
| | 10 | I've only had a maximum of about a 1000 conflicts to click through at most so it seems that I can just feel the pain an frustration of others and thank that I haven't had more. .. But since my biggest conflict issues have been caused by f*ckers who've messed up (dirty revert stuff) and I've wasted a few evenings/nights with those I will re-iterate that I think that it would be _really_ good if the project had Someone or Some Group of people that could run over the db with a given data set. |
| | 11 | |
| | 12 | So, two things: |
| | 13 | 1) I think there should be an option to give up all of one's conflicted edits in favor of the data on the server. .. There have been some cases where I haven't bothered to upload my edits at all because I haven't had the patience to run "their version" over mine (.. I currently have 136 cases left in my JOSM, will do that this time). |
| | 14 | 2) It would be just as good to have Someone (publicly appointed) who mappers could contact to persuade to run server data over with their data. |
| | 15 | |
| | 16 | Thoughts? |
