Changes between Initial Version and Version 5 of Ticket #3733

Timestamp:

2012-06-01T15:10:07+02:00 (13 years ago)

Author:

skyper

Comment:

from #7741 AM909:

In r5181:

The validator's "similar named ways" gives incorrect warnings in (at least) the following situations:

• "East Foothill Drive" and "West Foothill Drive": Should not report when the diffs are just leading or trailing cardinal directions. Can be tested by a second pass at reported errors. Run both args through s/East |West |North |South | East| West| North| South//g and then diff again. If no diff, no error should be reported.

• "5th Street" and "6th Street": Should not report when the diffs are only leading numbers. Similar to above, remove all leading numbers (1st |2nd |First |Second |etc.) and diff again. No diff = no report.

In the bounding box (34.0600548, -117.7425385, 34.1251634, -117.6477814) (BLTR), at least 50 of the 56 reported "similar named ways" fall into one of these two (invalid) scenarios.

mdk:

The same problem about railway platform names like "Gleis 1" and "Gleis 2".

EDIT: fix. @AM909: sorry