| 4 | | In this case I would tend to also include the (full) roundabout, caused just this would reflect the situation of the OSM-route. Further advantage: If a mapper added the roundabout at start/end of an OSM-route by mistake we will see this situation by its GPX-export and are able to correct it (by removing the roundabout within OSM-route) if necessary. |
| 5 | | Regarding gap: I don't quite understand. OSM-routes often have gaps (mostly because somebody edited/splitted/deleted ways of the route and forgot about proper consideration of routes on this ways). In this case JOSM should still export just 1 GPX-track ''<trk>'' - but consiting of multiple GPX-segments ''<trkseg>'' |
| | 4 | In this case I would tend to also include the (full) roundabout, cause just this would reflect the situation of the OSM-route. Further advantage: If a mapper added the roundabout at start/end of an OSM-route by mistake we will see this situation by its GPX-export and are able to correct it (by removing the roundabout within OSM-route) if necessary. |
| | 5 | Regarding gap: I don't quite understand. OSM-routes often have gaps (mostly because somebody edited/splitted/deleted ways of the route and forgot about proper consideration of routes on this ways). In this case JOSM should still export just 1 GPX-track ''<trk>'' - but consisting of multiple GPX-segments ''<trkseg>'' |