Opened 3 years ago
Last modified 21 months ago
#23126 new enhancement
area:highway should probably count here as highway — at Initial Version
| Reported by: | BartekChom | Owned by: | team |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | normal | Milestone: | |
| Component: | Core validator | Version: | latest |
| Keywords: | Cc: | Famlam |
Description
I have seen in Verdaccio some complains that probably are unnecessary. Famlam on Osmose GitHub identified relevant lines in your file and asked me to report it to you https://github.com/osm-fr/osmose-backend/issues/1986, so I am doing it, although I am a bit confused.
area:highway=* + smoothness=* (from https://josm.openstreetmap.de/browser/josm/trunk/resources/data/validator/combinations.mapcss#L276, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1162993735)
area:highway=steps + step_count=* (from https://josm.openstreetmap.de/browser/josm/trunk/resources/data/validator/combinations.mapcss#L24, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/950057163)
When I look at your file, I suspect that at least area:highway=service + living_street=yes should be accepted too despite https://josm.openstreetmap.de/browser/josm/trunk/resources/data/validator/combinations.mapcss#L17.
I am not sure, but probably [area:highway] should be added to all three lines (unless I should not duplicate such tags on area:highway - however I could argue that at least with smoothness users could want to know to what area it applies).
