Context Navigation

Changes between Version 3 and Version 4 of Ticket #23126, comment 7

v3	v4
1	1	OK, if you allow `smoothness=*` at least for `area:highway=emergency`, I cannot say that adding information is discouraged. As for bus_bay, passing_place, turning_loop/circle, mini_roundabout, to be honest, I am not sure, what tagging you suggest exactly. I have at most a tiny bit of experience with such cases.
2	2
3		[P.P.S. Oh, what about "For very micro mapping I can also imagine marking pieces with different smoothness."? OK, very micro mapping... I am sorry (I am repeating myself), I am about to stop, my writing is ~~gett~~ing more and more chaotic.]
	3	[P.P.S. Oh, what about "For very micro mapping I can also imagine marking pieces with different smoothness."? OK, very micro mapping... I am sorry (I am repeating myself), I am about to stop, my writing is becoming more and more chaotic.]
4	4
5	5	Cut ways in Pobierowo - OK, I suggested such approach myself, so I should apply it. I tried to make it a bit more correct. Description in Polish means [[https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147336007\|"the junction has special tags, suggested on (here)"]], but I am not sure that everything is correct, I am sorry. [P.S. Now I see that StreetComplete wants to add width, but actually I am not sure that it is meaningful at all for a purely junction fragment. I am sorry, if you have an idea you can apply, please do it, probably I will not do anything for a few weeks.]