Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of Ticket #23126, comment 7


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2024-02-11T18:45:51+01:00 (2 years ago)
Author:
BartekChom

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Ticket #23126, comment 7

    v1 v2  
    11OK, if you allow `smoothness=*` at least for `area:highway=emergency`, I cannot say that adding information is discouraged. As for bus_bay, passing_place, turning_loop/circle, mini_roundabout, to be honest, I am not sure, what tagging you suggest exactly. I have at most a tiny bit of experience with such cases.
    22
    3 Cut ways in Pobierowo - OK, I suggested such approach myself, so I should apply it. I tried to make it a bit more correct. Description in Polish means [[https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147336007|"the junction has special tags, suggested on (here)"]], but I am not sure that everything is correct, I am sorry. [Now I see that StreetComplete wants to add width, but actually I am not sure that it is meaningful at oll for a purely junction fragment. I am sorry, if you have an idea you can apply, please do it, probably I will not do anything for a few weeks.]
     3Cut ways in Pobierowo - OK, I suggested such approach myself, so I should apply it. I tried to make it a bit more correct. Description in Polish means [[https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147336007|"the junction has special tags, suggested on (here)"]], but I am not sure that everything is correct, I am sorry. [P.S. Now I see that StreetComplete wants to add width, but actually I am not sure that it is meaningful at all for a purely junction fragment. I am sorry, if you have an idea you can apply, please do it, probably I will not do anything for a few weeks.]
    44
    55There are even more complicated stairs - OK, I see.