Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #23126, comment 7
- Timestamp:
- 2024-02-11T18:45:11+01:00 (2 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #23126, comment 7
initial v1 1 1 OK, if you allow `smoothness=*` at least for `area:highway=emergency`, I cannot say that adding information is discouraged. As for bus_bay, passing_place, turning_loop/circle, mini_roundabout, to be honest, I am not sure, what tagging you suggest exactly. I have at most a tiny bit of experience with such cases. 2 2 3 Cut ways in Pobierowo - OK, I suggested such approach myself, so I should apply it. I tried to make it a bit more correct. Description in Polish means [[https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147336007|"the junction has special tags, suggested on (here)"]], but I am not sure that everything is correct, I am sorry. 3 Cut ways in Pobierowo - OK, I suggested such approach myself, so I should apply it. I tried to make it a bit more correct. Description in Polish means [[https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147336007|"the junction has special tags, suggested on (here)"]], but I am not sure that everything is correct, I am sorry. [Now I see that StreetComplete wants to add width, but actually I am not sure that it is meaningful at oll for a purely junction fragment. I am sorry, if you have an idea you can apply, please do it, probably I will not do anything for a few weeks.] 4 4 5 5 There are even more complicated stairs - OK, I see. … … 13 13 Thank you. It will be nice if you allow this `smoothness=*` for `area:highway=emergency` and even nicer if you manage to check consistency on linear ways inside one `highway:area=*`. 14 14 15 Besides I probably should not be stubborn. I am sorry, actually I am going to stop my activity on OSM for a few weeks from tomorrow. 15 Besides I probably should not be stubborn. I am sorry, actually I am going to stop my activity on OSM for a few weeks from tomorrow. I can think more afterwards.
