Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #22887


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2023-04-20T02:31:29+02:00 (3 years ago)
Author:
skyper
Comment:

Is Ubuntu package the correct component? Maybe, Michael Vogt (mvo), publisher of the josm snap at Canonical Snapcraft, can help here.

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #22887

    • Property Keywords linux added
  • Ticket #22887 – Description

    initial v1  
    11This may be a major source of duplicates for #14596. I'll have to look into updating the snap for current "best practices".
     2
     3taylor.smock wrote in [/ticket/14596#comment:67 comment 67] of #14596:
     4> Replying to [/ticket/14596#comment:66 cserpell@…]:
     5> > In Ubuntu 22.04, I noticed this started happening when I started using jOSM from snap version, instead of deb version from repository. I didn't change any option by myself, just the defaults.
     6> Thank you for this response.
     7>
     8> It gives us a place to start debugging why this problem keeps happening.
     9>
     10> 1. The snapcraft (see source:trunk/native/snapcraft.yaml) does ''not'' use the start script from source:trunk/native/linux/tested/etc/default/josm. This means that some required start arguments are not added. I don't know if we ''can'' use the start script (is JavaFX built into the snap? I don't know, and we kind of require javafx in the start script right now, mostly to avoid bug reports from Microsoft Streetside).
     11> 2. It looks like we haven't really changed the snapcraft.yml file in 5 years, give or take. Are we even following best practices for snaps any more?
     12>
     13> I'll see if I can figure out how to build the snap, and then I'll see if I can make the modifications for it.