Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #22343


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2022-09-04T17:53:45+02:00 (3 years ago)
Author:
Famlam
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #22343 – Description

    initial v1  
    11==== What steps will reproduce the problem?
    2 1. Validate attached example. The northern part of the cycleway is bi-directional (`oneway=no`). Such a case cannot fulfill the requirements of `junction=roundabout` (With bi-directional traffic, there must be a "yield" for one of the traffic flows or there will be a conflict between incoming/outgoing traffic and traffic remaining on the roundabout, so the roundabout would never have the complete right of way as required for a `junction=roundabout`). In this example, the Dutch traffic rules require that counter-clockwise traffic must yield for the traffic coming from the sides).
     2Validate attached example (next comment). The northern part of the cycleway is bi-directional (`oneway=no`). Such a case cannot fulfill the requirements of `junction=roundabout` (With bi-directional traffic, there must be a "yield" for one of the traffic flows or there will be a conflict between incoming/outgoing traffic and traffic remaining on the roundabout, so the roundabout would never have the complete right of way as required for a `junction=roundabout`). In this example, the Dutch traffic rules require that counter-clockwise traffic must yield for the traffic coming from the sides).
    33In addition, it conflicts with the implied `oneway=yes`.
    44
     
    1919}
    2020}}}
     21
     22Worldwide 815 cases at the moment.
    2123
    2224