Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #22343
- Timestamp:
- 2022-09-04T17:53:45+02:00 (3 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #22343 – Description
initial v1 1 1 ==== What steps will reproduce the problem? 2 1.Validate attached example. The northern part of the cycleway is bi-directional (`oneway=no`). Such a case cannot fulfill the requirements of `junction=roundabout` (With bi-directional traffic, there must be a "yield" for one of the traffic flows or there will be a conflict between incoming/outgoing traffic and traffic remaining on the roundabout, so the roundabout would never have the complete right of way as required for a `junction=roundabout`). In this example, the Dutch traffic rules require that counter-clockwise traffic must yield for the traffic coming from the sides).2 Validate attached example (next comment). The northern part of the cycleway is bi-directional (`oneway=no`). Such a case cannot fulfill the requirements of `junction=roundabout` (With bi-directional traffic, there must be a "yield" for one of the traffic flows or there will be a conflict between incoming/outgoing traffic and traffic remaining on the roundabout, so the roundabout would never have the complete right of way as required for a `junction=roundabout`). In this example, the Dutch traffic rules require that counter-clockwise traffic must yield for the traffic coming from the sides). 3 3 In addition, it conflicts with the implied `oneway=yes`. 4 4 … … 19 19 } 20 20 }}} 21 22 Worldwide 815 cases at the moment. 21 23 22 24