Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #22042, comment 6


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2022-05-04T16:40:53+02:00 (4 years ago)
Author:
taylor.smock

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Ticket #22042, comment 6

    initial v1  
    22> If I remember correctly the validator uses the data in the presets, so both need changes if this should be supported. I wouldn't mind if JOSM supports this, I just agreed to Dirk (stoecker) that the concept is not very good.
    33
    4 You remember correctly. We do have a specific test for [source:trunk/src/org/openstreetmap/josm/data/validation/tests/TurnrestrictionTest.java turn restrictions], so we could ''technically'' carve out an exception in code (and GerdP did that in r14494, which was reverted in r14501). But we would still want to modify the preset, as that is checked if the turn restriction test is [source:trunk/src/org/openstreetmap/josm/data/validation/tests/RelationChecker.java@HEAD:110,128,146#L146 disabled].
     4You remember correctly. We do have a specific test for [source:trunk/src/org/openstreetmap/josm/data/validation/tests/TurnrestrictionTest.java turn restrictions], so we could ''technically'' carve out an exception in code (and you (GerdP) did that in r14494, which was reverted in r14501). But we would still want to modify the preset, as that is checked if the turn restriction test is [source:trunk/src/org/openstreetmap/josm/data/validation/tests/RelationChecker.java@HEAD:110,128,146#L146 disabled].
    55
    66With the following overpass query, I found 198 relations with more than one `from` member (`no_entry`) and 10 relations with more than one `to` member (`no_exit`). In short, the number of relations have not substantially changed in the three years since comment:17:ticket:17057 (127 and 13, respectively). TBH, I suspect `only_` restrictions are used instead, with some probably being marked as oneways.