Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #21038, comment 9


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2021-09-27T15:35:52+02:00 (4 years ago)
Author:
tomasmarklund

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Ticket #21038, comment 9

    initial v1  
    44I think that would solve the problem in a very efficient way, yes.
    55
    6 The general problem is that railway tracks i reality DO end in closer proximity to each other than "other" roads/paths/cycleways etc, without this being "wrong". A smaller value for railways would probably solve most of the "false warnings".
     6The general problem is that railway tracks in reality DO end in closer proximity to each other than "other" roads/paths/cycleways etc, without this being "wrong". A smaller value for railways would probably solve most of the "false warnings".
    77