Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #20989, comment 7
- Timestamp:
- 2021-07-13T22:56:10+02:00 (5 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #20989, comment 7
initial v1 3 3 Well I'm aware that this is the chain of events that is currently happening, however I think that at least some of the steps are unnecessary just before closing. I agree on the can of worms though. 4 4 5 So in that case the easiest solution would probably be to shutdown the worker after removing all layers (that still means that the nextactive layer isalways set, which doesn't seem ideal to me but that's just status quo).5 So in that case the easiest solution would probably be to shutdown the worker after removing all layers (that still means that a new active layer is set multiple times while closing, which doesn't seem ideal to me but that's just status quo). 6 6 7 7 Or fixing it in the geoimage layer, basically making sure that all instances using the worker check if it's still alive.


