Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #20795


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2021-04-24T19:43:00+02:00 (5 years ago)
Author:
StephaneP
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Ticket #20795 – Description

    initial v1  
    11==== What steps will reproduce the problem?
    221. Load the images and the track.gpx file you can found inside the attached samples archive
    3 2. correlate the images with the gpx (offset is 00:00, enable `override position for image with geo location in exif data`)
     32. correlate the images with the gpx (offset is 00:00, enable `override position for image with geo location in exif data`) You should see something like this:
     4[[Image(01.png)]]
    453. Convert the gpx to a data layer
    564. add a point to make a < instead of the straight line
     7[[Image(02.png)]]
    685. export this layer to a gpx file, and overwrite the existing track.gpx
    796. Start a new image correlation, click on `open another gpx`, select track.gpx and correlate (enable `override position for image with geo location in exif data`)
    8107. it should be ok.
     11[[Image(03.png)]]
    9128. drag and drop the track.gpx on Josm
    10139. convert the gpx to a data layer and edit the center node to transform the < to a >
     14[[Image(04.png)]]
    111510. export this layer to a gpx file, and overwrite the existing track.gpx
    121611. Start another image correlation, click on `open another gpx`, select track.gpx (enable `override position for image with geo location in exif data`)
    … …  
    1620==== What happens instead?
    1721The images seem correlated with the previous gpx (with the < instead of the >)
     22[[Image(05.png)]]
    1823
    1924==== Please provide any additional information below. Attach a screenshot if possible.
    … …  
    2126It seems Josm keep the previous versions in memory, and don't use the new version.
    2227
    23 WIP : inserting screenshot
    2428{{{
    2529URL:https://josm.openstreetmap.de/svn/trunk