Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #20121, comment 13
- Timestamp:
- 2020-11-24T00:06:31+01:00 (5 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #20121, comment 13
initial v1 15 15 > Maybe one problem with this test is that it reports different types of problems. While crossing highways often just need a common node the problem with a highway crossing the outline of a building or a natural=water is completely different. Adding a node doesn't fix the problem but will remove the warning. Mappers might say "JOSM told me to add a common node". 16 16 17 +1, we need separate warnings and tests depending on the tags of the crossing ways. The situation might also depend on the tags of the common node and if a linear way of the same kind is sharing the common node. With a highway crossing a building, I expect the highway to have a different `layer=*` and `bridge=*` or `tunnel=*`. With common nodes, I expect to have the way inside the building to have `tunnel=building_passage` and be connected to other `highway=*` at the common nodes. If the linear `highway=*` ends at the common node with the building without another linear highway to the inside connected, I expect a tag on the common node like `entrance=* ´or `barrier=*`.17 +1, we need separate warnings and tests depending on the tags of the crossing ways. The situation might also depend on the tags of the common node and if a linear way of the same kind is sharing the common node. With a highway crossing a building, I expect the highway to have a different `layer=*` and `bridge=*` or `tunnel=*`. With common nodes, I expect to have the way inside the building to have `tunnel=building_passage` and be connected to other `highway=*` at the common nodes. If the linear `highway=*` ends at the common node with the building without another linear highway to the inside connected, I expect a tag on the common node like `entrance=*` or `barrier=*`. 18 18 19 19 Replying to [comment:11 GerdP]:
