Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #19996, comment 5


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2021-06-11T08:18:36+02:00 (4 years ago)
Author:
reichg

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Ticket #19996, comment 5

    initial v1  
    11So then the question I guess is: do we keep the warning that {{{motor_vehicles=yes}}} on {{{highway=tertiary}}} and above is unnecessary and remove the warning for anything below {{{highway=tertiary}}}? That way there is a compromise AND I think it would be safe to say the general consensus would be that on {{{highway=tertiary}}} and above the usage by {{{motor_vehicles}}} is implied.
    22
    3 I do agree that on {{{highway=residential}}} roads {{{motor_vehicles=yes}}} could be useful and that {{{motor_vehicle=*}}} might be unnecessary on {{{highway=tertiary}}} and above.
     3I do agree that on {{{highway=residential}}} roads {{{motor_vehicles=yes}}} could be useful and that {{{motor_vehicle=yes}}} might be unnecessary on {{{highway=tertiary}}} and above.
    44
    55Either way this is an easy patch to make.