Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #19465, comment 14
- Timestamp:
- 2020-11-11T13:33:25+01:00 (5 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #19465, comment 14
initial v1 1 -1 for ignoring `layer=*` in general. Do not like the idea of having e.g. a river and a highway sharing segments at all and still find lots of `landuse=*` with negative `layer=*` in the data. 1 -1 for not ignoring `layer=*` in general. Do not like the idea of having e.g. a river and a highway sharing segments at all and still find lots of `landuse=*` with negative `layer=*` in the data. 2 2 3 3 There are not many `highway=*` together with `area=yes` allowed, `service`, `pedestrian` and maybe `footway` and `path`. I am not a fan of it at all as it mixes line features with area features. Using `area:highway` all the way would help a lot. In my eyes, they should not share segments but either some common nodes when the highway crosses the area or a extra short open way connecting the two objects.


