Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #19465, comment 14


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2020-11-11T13:33:25+01:00 (5 years ago)
Author:
skyper

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #19465, comment 14

    initial v1  
    1 -1 for ignoring `layer=*` in general. Do not like the idea of having e.g. a river and a highway sharing segments at all and still find lots of `landuse=*` with negative `layer=*` in the data.
     1-1 for not ignoring `layer=*` in general. Do not like the idea of having e.g. a river and a highway sharing segments at all and still find lots of `landuse=*` with negative `layer=*` in the data.
    22
    33There are not many `highway=*` together with `area=yes` allowed, `service`, `pedestrian` and maybe `footway` and `path`. I am not a fan of it at all as it mixes line features with area features. Using `area:highway` all the way would help a lot. In my eyes, they should not share segments but either some common nodes when the highway crosses the area or a extra short open way connecting the two objects.