Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #19148, comment 8


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2020-04-24T17:13:18+02:00 (19 months ago)
Author:
GerdP
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #19148, comment 8

    initial v1  
    22- `name="Multi_Multi (No warnings)"` is a correct and very simple multipolygon, only the description and the name are confusing. I see no complex cheat here. Not related to the subject.
    33- The two `description=Useless multipolygon with only one outer` are correct, just overly complex. Not related to the subject, but might be worth to warn about this case.
    4 - `name="Valid but warnings"` is suspicous. IMHO it is an old-style multipolygion.
     4- `name="Valid but warnings"` is suspicous. ~~IMHO it is an old-style multipolygon.~~
    55- the `name=Wood vs Forest` is not a problem, thus not related to the subject.
    6 - the `name=Incorrect` looks correct to me. JOSM doesn't complain and I wonder why you think that the outer ring of multipolygon must have a "primary" tag. My understanding is that '''must not''' have a primary tag. That would be an old style multipolygon.
     6- the `name=Incorrect` looks correct to me. JOSM doesn't complain and I wonder why you think that the outer ring of multipolygon must have a "primary" tag. ~~My understanding is that '''must not''' have a primary tag. That would be an old style multipolygon.~~ It can have a primary tag. Typical usage: closed way with natural=coastline is outer in a natural=bare_rock MP having a single member.
    77