Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of Ticket #18863, comment 20


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2020-03-26T21:20:11+01:00 (5 years ago)
Author:
skyper

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Ticket #18863, comment 20

    v1 v2  
    22> If the parents of the split node are all known there should be no need to look at the member list, else the incomplete ways of the relation might also end at the given node, right?
    33The parents of the **end** nodes of the way to split. This should work for most cases. Special treatment need:
    4 * loops
    5 * dual-way routes with role `forward/backward`
     4* ~~loops~~ ''not for download''
     5* ~~dual-way routes with role `forward/backward`~~ ''not for download''
    66* ptv1 is most tricky where even middle nodes might get important. Not sure if 7240.2 is valid where the two variants come together in a middle node.
    77
     8
    89You still need to look at the member list for the right position and if the new way needs to be added multiple times but usually not in order to decide if downloading more members is needed.