Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #18596, comment 82
- Timestamp:
- 2020-02-28T08:57:31+01:00 (6 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #18596, comment 82
initial v1 1 The commit produced some new strings. Some use the phrase "part of a relation" for relation members. When meaning not yet downloaded members of relations JOSM uses "incomplete" für ''unvollständig''. JOSM favors the members wording .1 The commit produced some new strings. Some use the phrase "part of a relation" for relation members. When meaning not yet downloaded members of relations JOSM uses "incomplete" für ''unvollständig''. JOSM favors the "members" wording for elements of relations. 2 2 3 Parts of ways are called "segments" in JOSM. I guess here are the new ways meant. 3 Parts of ways are called "segments" in JOSM. I guess here are the new ways meant. (See line 735) 4 4 5 The i18n process for some languages wants even for singular placeholders for numbers. So the code must do this for all languages. The patch does some Word Processing with the message of the dialog. In European languages this might seem possible but elsewhere it may create more problems than benefit. For translators the number of words in a long fragment is not an issue. Problems are very short fragments whose meanings do not depend on them self but who are going to be recombined. So these strings might want to be rechecked: 5 The i18n process for some languages wants even for singular cases a placeholders for the number value 1. (See line 743 and #9110) 6 7 The patch does some Word Processing with the message of the dialog. In European languages this might seem possible but elsewhere it may create more problems than benefit. For translators the number of words in a long fragment is not an issue. Problems are very short fragments whose meanings do not depend on themselves. So these strings might want to be rechecked: 6 8 7 9 >Download missing relation members? 8 =Download incomplete relation members?10 Download incomplete relation members? 9 11 10 12 >This way is part of a relation. … … 33 35 34 36 35 Thanks for the good work. Those nasty relation errors are a pain. 37 Thanks for the good work. Those nasty relation errors are a pain. Could type=waterways be included in this?
