Changes between Version 6 and Version 7 of Ticket #17504, comment 10


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2019-03-23T18:42:58+01:00 (5 years ago)
Author:
mkoniecz

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Ticket #17504, comment 10

    v6 v7  
    2020Still, for example in Poland my automated `is_in` removal edit received support to remove `is_in:country` and equivalents, without unanimous support for removal `is_in:province` and just today I was discussing in one of my changesets with someone who was convinced that using OSM database as cache for their data processing is valid use for tags.
    2121
    22 `is_in:continent` removal requested in this ticket was intended as fir step toward `is_in*` removal so I am not going to protest, but I am not sure is there consensus for `is_in` full scale elimination (that is why I proposed removal of just `is_in:continent` as something clearly unacceptable).
     22`is_in:continent` removal requested in this ticket was intended as the first step toward `is_in*` removal so I am not going to protest, but I am not sure is there consensus for `is_in` full scale elimination (that is why I proposed removal of just `is_in:continent` as something clearly unacceptable).
    2323
    2424>  But your test doesn't check if the corresponding relation exists.