Context Navigation

Changes between Version 2 and Version 3 of Ticket #17504, comment 10

v2	v3
20	20	Still, for example in Poland my automated `is_in` removal edit received support to remove `is_in:country` and equivalents, without unanimous support for removal `is_in:province` and just today I was discussing in one of my changesets with someone who was convinced that using OSM database as cache for their data processing is valid use for tags.
21	21
22		`is_in:continent` removal requested in this ticket was intended as fir step toward `is_in*` removal so I am not going to protest, but I am not sure is there consensus for `is_in` full scale elimination (that is why I proposed removal of just `is_in`).
	22	`is_in:continent` removal requested in this ticket was intended as fir step toward `is_in*` removal so I am not going to protest, but I am not sure is there consensus for `is_in` full scale elimination (that is why I proposed removal of just `is_in:continent` as something clearly unacceptable).
23	23
24	24	> But your test doesn't check if the corresponding relation exists.