Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #16208, comment 4


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2018-04-19T23:45:20+02:00 (8 years ago)
Author:
ypid23

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #16208, comment 4

    initial v1  
    1 Good evening and thanks for cc-ing me. The interesting thing is that OSM is adopting the opening_hours syntax for many more tags than what it was originally designed for. Thats leads to the situation where for a highway, a time might appear as optional, for amenities it would probably be an error when there is no time specified. That is why it complains. As said by Don-vip, you could add `00:00-24:00` to make the validator (and me) happy. Extra bonus points for also being explicit about the public holiday (that they have no influence on this). Again, see my comment. The syntax has a different focus and having different warnings or a sub-syntax or stuff like this is no solution. I support the use of the syntax at other places, just please follow it even when it seems unnecessary for the tag.
     1Good evening and thanks for cc-ing me. The interesting thing is that OSM is adapting the opening_hours syntax for many more tags than what it was originally designed for. Thats leads to the situation where for a highway, a time might appear as optional, for amenities it would probably be an error when there is no time specified. That is why it complains. As said by Don-vip, you could add `00:00-24:00` to make the validator (and me) happy. Extra bonus points for also being explicit about the public holiday (that they have no influence on this). Again, see my comment. The syntax has a different focus and having different warnings or a sub-syntax or stuff like this is no solution. I support the use of the syntax at other places, just please follow it even when it seems unnecessary for the tag.
    22
    33