Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of Ticket #15360, comment 6
- Timestamp:
- 2017-09-28T09:54:14+02:00 (7 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #15360, comment 6
v1 v2 1 1 I don't see why this relation would be "simply wrong", nor do I understand what would be different if I'd use a site relation. From my understanding, the only purpose where a site relation is needed is when you want to employ special ''roles''. 2 According to the [https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon OSM wiki], the multipolygon relations are''"are used to represent complex areas"'' (that's what we have here). There is also some explanatory text: ''"(e.g., because its outline consists of several ways joined together, or because the area consists of multiple disjunct parts, or has holes)"''2 According to the [https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon OSM wiki], the multipolygon relations ''"are used to represent complex areas"'' (that's what we have here). There is also some explanatory text: ''"(e.g., because its outline consists of several ways joined together, or because the area consists of multiple disjunct parts, or has holes)"'' 3 3 The relation in question is an example for "multiple disjunct parts".
