Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of Ticket #13877, comment 16
- Timestamp:
- 2016-11-01T18:26:17+01:00 (8 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
TabularUnified Ticket #13877, comment 16
v1 v2 1 OK, we should exclude objects with `area=no` or `attraction=*` to avoid false positives like [osmwww:way/175034247] or [osmwww:way/192657911]. However it seems we can't avoid a few false positives for e.g. [osmwww:way/114691942] or [osmwww:way/225105909]. (The last example is actually mapped wrong, but it could be a false positive if the multipolygon wouldn't be present.)1 OK, we should exclude objects with `area=no` ~~and~~ or `attraction=*` to avoid false positives like [osmwww:way/175034247] or [osmwww:way/192657911]. However it seems we can't avoid a few false positives for e.g. [osmwww:way/114691942] or [osmwww:way/225105909]. (The last example is actually mapped wrong, but it could be a false positive if the multipolygon wouldn't be present.)