Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of Ticket #12427, comment 20


Ignore:
Timestamp:
2016-01-25T08:29:30+01:00 (10 years ago)
Author:
cmuelle8

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Ticket #12427, comment 20

    v1 v2  
    2222
    2323Let the recursion step be {{{return thres > ret ? ret : r(a, m, ret)+r(m, b, ret);}}},
    24 then a ray that strictly intersects at the middle is not needed. Using {{{br}}} to simply find a
    25 point ''guaranteed'' to lie on the "greate ellipse" will suffice. Any split ratio will do.
     24then using {{{br}}} to simply find any point ''guaranteed'' to lie on the "greate ellipse" will suffice.
    2625
    2726{{{thres}}} is not {{{eps}}} - it needs to be chosen in a different way, reasonably large,