Changes between Version 2 and Version 3 of Ticket #11753, comment 4
- Timestamp:
- 2016-09-03T04:10:07+02:00 (9 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #11753, comment 4
v2 v3 1 1 Support that there shouldn't be distinction. path/footway wasn't the best way to tag objects and many users use what was available. 2 2 3 We should tag surface/tracktype instead of path/footway distinction. I prefer single tag (say, hw=footway) as mapper and for other developers. 3 We should tag surface/tracktype instead of path/footway distinction. I prefer single tag (say, hw=footway) as mapper and for other developers. Very clear explanation why? by gravitystorm is here: [https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1698#issuecomment-134905532 1] [https://gist.github.com/gravitystorm/ff5a6fdc695f08de1751 2]. 4 4 5 5 Personally I use path/footway only because I have no time to enter every detail of the surface or I wasn't able to collect all data during observations.


