Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #11466, comment 1
- Timestamp:
- 2015-05-22T19:03:36+02:00 (9 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #11466, comment 1
initial v1 11 11 12 12 I would go with the recommendation from the latter and do: 13 `new ConcurrentHashMap<>(8, 0.9f, 1);` instead of `new HashMap<>()` 13 `new ConcurrentHashMap<>(8, 0.9f, 1);` instead of `new HashMap<>()` as the performance of ConcurrentHashMap is not significantly worse than unsafe HashMap. 14 14 15 15 Unless we have some better clues about the usage of the map.