id	summary	reporter	owner	description	type	status	priority	milestone	component	version	resolution	keywords	cc
19094	"[Patch] Warning about ""placement:forward/backward=transition"""	skyper	team	"==== What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Have a way with `placement:forward/backward=transition`
1. Run validator

==== What is the expected result?
A warning suggesting to use `placement=transition`

==== What happens instead?
No informational warning

==== Please provide any additional information below. Attach a screenshot if possible.
There is no need to use `forward/backward` with `transition` but it does not really harm. Still tagging scheme would be more consistent if only `placement=transition` would be used.

{{{
Relative:URL: ^/trunk
Repository:UUID: 0c6e7542-c601-0410-84e7-c038aed88b3b
Last:Changed Date: 2020-04-13 22:05:56 +0200 (Mon, 13 Apr 2020)
Revision:16294
Build-Date:2020-04-14 01:30:47
URL:https://josm.openstreetmap.de/svn/trunk
}}}
"	enhancement	closed	normal	20.07	Core validator		fixed	lanes-tagging placement transition