Changes between Version 2 and Version 3 of ServerCertificate


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Oct 31, 2011 10:53:17 AM (19 months ago)
Author:
stoecker
Comment:

Typo

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • ServerCertificate

    v2 v3  
    22 
    33== Brief explanation == 
    4 The certificate of JOSM's site is invalid because it's self signed. This means that the certificate is good, but it hasn't been acknowledged by any of the certification authorities currently present in the world. To do so, JOSM would have to pay a fee to get a certificate signed by any of those authorities, but since JOSM is a free association of volunteers, no money is available to pay for a valid certificate. So the certificate has been signed by themselves, which is already a form of validation, since the JOSM people are very trustworthy, or better, it has been self signed. 
     4The certificate of JOSM's site is called invalid because it's self signed. This means that the certificate is good, but it hasn't been acknowledged by any of the certification authorities currently present in the world. To do so, JOSM would have to pay a fee to get a certificate signed by any of those authorities, but since JOSM is a free association of volunteers, no money is available to pay for a valid certificate. So the certificate has been signed by themselves, which is already a form of validation, since the JOSM people are very trustworthy, or better, it has been self signed. 
    55 
    66Certificates by acknowledged authorities are trusted automatically. Self-signed certificates must be accepted individually. After they have been accepted they offer the same level of security.