Improve reverse way user interface

[stoecker]

Usually a user reversing a way really wants to reverse the way (e.g. oneway). So I suggest an improved interface.

When a oneway=yes way is reversed, ask

• Do you want to reverse oneway direction (results in reversed way and oneway=yes)
• Do you want to reverse way (results in normal dialog which leads to reversed way and oneway=-1)

For oneway -1 an additional selection should be there to get rid of these -1's when possible.

When a oneway=-1 way is reversed, ask

• Do you want to reverse oneway direction only (results in normal way and oneway=yes)
• Do you want to reverse oneway direction (results in reversed way and oneway=-1)
• Do you want to reverse way (results in normal dialog which leads to reversed way and oneway=yes)

If more complicated cases appear, stick to normal dialog.

Maybe we simply can add additional "shortcut" buttons to the normal tag correction display.

[skyper]

Please, no more questions and windows on reverting oneway. I often need it to keep the proper OSM id and/or not to delete + create objects on cut and connect. I already have to click once for the initial revert and later for each part.

At least have an option to use the answer for all objects involved in this action and not only single per object or save for ever (save per session is in my opinion unsafe for a question of this importance).

[stoecker]

As told above this changes thequestion already asked to be more meaningful. No additional questions.

[skyper]

Replying to stoecker:

As told above this changes thequestion already asked to be more meaningful. No additional questions.

Sorry, did not read properly.

Then below would be another enhancement:

Replying to skyper:

At least have an option to use the answer for all objects involved in this action and not only single per object or save for ever (save per session is in my opinion unsafe for a question of this importance).