The content of elements must consist of well-formed character data or markup

[anonymous]

What steps will reproduce the problem?

1. Do some editing
2. try to upload the results to the server
3. An error happens

What is the expected result?

Data should be sent to the server

What happens instead?

a pop-up windows indicating that a programming error happened

Please provide any additional information below. Attach a screenshot if
possible.

Repository Root: http://josm.openstreetmap.de/svn
Build-Date: 2011-10-04 01:31:24
Last Changed Author: bastiK
Revision: 4487
Repository UUID: 0c6e7542-c601-0410-84e7-c038aed88b3b
URL: http://josm.openstreetmap.de/svn/trunk
Last Changed Date: 2011-10-03 22:52:38 +0200 (Mon, 03 Oct 2011)
Last Changed Rev: 4487

Identification: JOSM/1.5 (4487 fr)
Memory Usage: 247 MB / 247 MB (130 MB allocated, but free)
Java version: 1.6.0_29, Sun Microsystems Inc., Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM
Operating system: Windows XP
Dataset consistency test: No problems found

Plugin: cadastre-fr (26835)
Plugin: licensechange (26606)
Plugin: openstreetbugs (26606)
Plugin: turnrestrictions (26666)

org.openstreetmap.josm.io.OsmTransferException: org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: The content of elements must consist of well-formed character data or markup.
	at org.openstreetmap.josm.io.OsmApi.uploadDiff(OsmApi.java:473)
	at org.openstreetmap.josm.io.OsmServerWriter.uploadChangesAsDiffUpload(OsmServerWriter.java:119)
	at org.openstreetmap.josm.io.OsmServerWriter.uploadOsm(OsmServerWriter.java:195)
	at org.openstreetmap.josm.gui.io.UploadPrimitivesTask.realRun(UploadPrimitivesTask.java:233)
	at org.openstreetmap.josm.gui.PleaseWaitRunnable.doRealRun(PleaseWaitRunnable.java:79)
	at org.openstreetmap.josm.gui.PleaseWaitRunnable.run(PleaseWaitRunnable.java:125)
	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(Unknown Source)
	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(Unknown Source)
	at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Sourc

[mdk]

Again a french JOSM [JOSM/1.5 (4487 fr)] XML generation problem. Same as #6999 and #6995?

If so, it should be changed to blocker (at least for french mappers ;-)

[stoecker]

Closed as duplicate of #6999.