Opened 3 years ago
Closed 2 years ago
#5015 closed enhancement (fixed)
rfe: logical AND & for search tool
| Reported by: | HamishB <hamish_b@…> | Owned by: | team |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | normal | Component: | Core |
| Version: | tested | Keywords: | search |
| Cc: |
Description
Hi,
I'm surprised that the search tool includes OR |, but not AND &.
I finally figured out that I can run the tool multiple times to get the same effect, but that seems like a lot of work vs. just typing out a simple quasi-SQL line of logic.
can we have it? is it already there and just not documented? (don't think so, as it fails)
thanks,
Hamish
Attachments (0)
Change History (4)
comment:1 Changed 3 years ago by jttt
comment:2 Changed 3 years ago by HamishB <hamish_b@…>
jttt:
and is implicit, just type two expressions and both of them will
need to match.
ah, excellent. maybe just make AND a no-op? .. i.e. just parse the word out of the string to ignore it? hmmm, I wonder how that will effect ( ) constructions?
thanks for the quick reply,
Hamish
comment:3 Changed 3 years ago by Ldp
Just be careful how this is handled when the data does actually contain 'AND'. A quoted "AND" should definately not be a no-op.
comment:4 Changed 2 years ago by bastiK
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from new to closed
In [3818/josm]:



and is implicit, just type two expressions and both of them will need to match. For example key1=value1 key2=value2 search for primitives that have both key1=value1 and key2=value2
But this is not first time somebody is asking about AND, maybe this should be documented and even optional AND or & might be supported.