merging a new and an already existing node

[anonymous]

If you merge a newly created node to an existing node, the existing node should not be deleted.

node(ID:-1) + node(ID:1234) --merge--> node(ID:1234)

[mjulius]

Since r2341 Merge Nodes always merges onto the last selected node.

[vsandre]

Please introduce it anyway. A little bit lesser database flooding.

BTW I checked the new behaviour out, after reporting this bug. Nice feature.

[Gubaer]

Trying to reformulate:

• When a ordered list of nodes [node_1,node_2,..., node_n] (in the order of selection, first selected node first, last selected node last) are merged using Tools-Merge Nodes one of the nodes becomes the target node. The other nodes are deleted.

• Current situation: the last node node_n becomes the target node

• Proposed enhancement in this ticket: select the last non-new node as target node. If no such node exists, still select the last node.

[mjulius]

Replying to Gubaer:

* Proposed enhancement in this ticket: select the last non-new node as target node. If no such node exists, still select the last node.

And the target node should get the coordinates of the last selected node. This was the point of r2341.

[Gubaer]

And the target node should get the coordinates of the last selected node. This was the point of r2341.

Right. I give it another try:

• When an ordered list of nodes [node_1,node_2,..., node_n] (in the order of selection, first selected node first, last selected node last) are merged using Tools->Merge Nodes one of the nodes becomes the survinging node. The other nodes are deleted.

• Current situation: the last node node_n becomes the survinging node

• Proposed enhancement in this ticket: select the last non-new node as surviving node. If no such node exists, select the last selected node. The surviving node is always assigned the position of the last selected node.

[vsandre]

Replying to Gubaer:

And the target node should get the coordinates of the last selected node. This was the point of r2341.

Right. I give it another try: * When an ordered list of nodes [node_1,node_2,..., node_n] (in the order of selection, first selected node first, last selected node last) are merged using Tools->Merge Nodes one of the nodes becomes the survinging node. The other nodes are deleted. * Current situation: the last node node_n becomes the survinging node * Proposed enhancement in this ticket: select the last non-new node as surviving node. If no such node exists, select the last selected node. The surviving node is always assigned the position of the last selected node.

+1

[skyper]

If JOSM could revert changes on server I think it would be data the best to keep the lowest id and use the last node as (new) position.

[skyper]

Replying to skyper:

If JOSM could revert changes on server I think it would be data the best to keep the lowest id and use the last node as (new) position.

[bastiK]

(In [3134]) fixed #4606 - merging a new and an already existing node (better selection of "surviving" node)