show note= again at relations

[malenki]

At the relationlist up to some not so old versions one was showed the name of the raltion and if nonexistend the contend of the note-field. Now that behaviour is changed into showing the relation-ID if no name is present.
I want the old behaviour back. It is not useful start tagging hikingroutes with name=red bar which i found between city A and village B.
How is one supposed to tell the routes apart from each other? Surely not by learning all the IDs inside out. At the moment I edit a one days 55 km-log. The date I downloaded along contains about 54 relations of which 33 are routes. Enhancing hiking routes (which whas the main reason i spent my holidays for OSM) is impossible at the moment so please fix that quick.

java version "1.6.0_15"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_15-b03)
Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 14.1-b02, mixed mode)

josm 1992

[anonymous]

This is not really critical. Setting to normal.

[Gubaer]

(In [1997]) fixed #3328: show note= again at relations

[anonymous]

Replying to anonymous:

This is not really critical. Setting to normal.

... but I fixed it anyway :-)

[Ldp]

This is a duplicate of #1747 that was reopened *yesterday*. Funny thing, new tickets attract more attention than reopens of old tickets. I'll remember that.

[anonymous]

Oh, I didn't yet scroll down to #1747 ;-) Now, it's closed too.

[malenki]

It was critical to me since I could not continue working at "my" hiking routes. Indeed it would have been blocker for me, if there wouldn't be a "tested" JOSM. ;)

Sorry I did not find 1747. I admit this time i had forgotten to search for an existing ticket.

And I want to thank you for the fast fixing!

Regards
malenki

[Ldp]

Malenki, you can always step back to an earlier 'latest' as well:

http://josm.openstreetmap.de/download/

[anonymous]

And I want to thank you for the fast fixing!

I had to, it was me who broke it ;-)

[malenki]

anonymous broke it? I hope anonymous will fix it again since it's broken in 2091 again.

[Gubaer]

Can't reproduced. I tried the following steps:

# create new relation
# add just one tag: note=This is a note

The relation is then displayed with the name relation("This is a note"), 0 elements) in the relation list dialog.

Do you have more specific infos about what is going wrong?

[malenki]

Sorry, my failure this time. I mixed up a relation which had indeed no note with another one with the same amount of elements :(

[malenki]

I am sorry to reopen this again, but I found one relation whose note is not - unlike all others - displayed. Strange thing. The relation is # 239129, see also the screenshot.

[Gubaer]

The tag key is note (with a trailing blank).

Could qualify as a "data error" but I guess I'd better fix it in the code (checking for "note" tags with whathever-sequence-of-trailing-or-leading-whitespace) ;-)

[malenki]

arghs -.- And I thought I checked everything.
sigh

Thanks for letting me bother you. ;)

[Gubaer]

fixed in r2136