Modify

Opened 4 years ago

Closed 4 years ago

Last modified 4 years ago

#3306 closed defect (fixed)

[PATCH] Restriction "no-u-turn" dont work when "via-way" has wrong orientation

Reported by: anonymous Owned by: dmuecke
Priority: minor Component: Core
Version: Keywords:
Cc:

Description

The restriction "no-u-turn" dont work when "via-way" has wrong orientation. More (in german) see here: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=4438

Attachments (5)

no_u_turn.osm (40.2 KB) - added by anonymous 4 years ago.
no-u-turn-demo
no_u_turn.png (148.5 KB) - added by anonymous 4 years ago.
Picture 1.png (28.8 KB) - added by dmuecke 4 years ago.
correct u-turn signs
uturn.txt (3.1 KB) - added by dmuecke 4 years ago.
test_restriction.osm (32.2 KB) - added by dmuecke 4 years ago.

Download all attachments as: .zip

Change History (27)

comment:1 Changed 4 years ago by dmuecke

  • Owner changed from team to dmuecke
  • Status changed from new to assigned

comment:2 Changed 4 years ago by dmuecke

  • Summary changed from Restriction "no-u-turn" dont work when "via-way" has wrong orientation to [PATCH] Restriction "no-u-turn" dont work when "via-way" has wrong orientation

JOSM does suppress now drawing u-turn sign if via isn't a node and doesn't mark it an error any longer. Attached patch should fix the issue.

comment:3 Changed 4 years ago by stoecker

Why do you disable drawing the turn-sign in case of via ways?

comment:4 Changed 4 years ago by dmuecke

Signs looking odd. I would expect to see no left turn signs rather.

comment:5 Changed 4 years ago by Dennis

The patch isn't integrated in version 1998?
I have no Compiler for testing the patch.
-- Dennis

comment:6 Changed 4 years ago by dmuecke

Not as long as Trac resolution status isn't fixed.

comment:7 Changed 4 years ago by stoecker

I'm not happy with the current patch. First I do not like disabling the icon and second I think the patch is not exactly how it should be (I can't describe better ATM).

comment:8 Changed 4 years ago by Dennis

Okay, that right too. Thanks. I am a little confused, because I ha've read over the word "suppress" yesterday... ;)

comment:9 Changed 4 years ago by dmuecke

  • Summary changed from [PATCH] Restriction "no-u-turn" dont work when "via-way" has wrong orientation to Restriction "no-u-turn" dont work when "via-way" has wrong orientation

After taking a nap I think I know what to change. The place on the map where u-turn restriction signs were drawn is wrong.
I'm going to fix it when I'm back from holiday.

comment:10 Changed 4 years ago by dmuecke

  • Summary changed from Restriction "no-u-turn" dont work when "via-way" has wrong orientation to [PATCH] Restriction "no-u-turn" dont work when "via-way" has wrong orientation

Issue fixed, patch attached!

comment:11 Changed 4 years ago by stoecker

Some minor things: The "oneway" check needs to use the OsmUtils to check for "true" value. Also could you please add all the relevant test and error cases in data/restriction.osm, so we have a reproducable test-file.

Changed 4 years ago by anonymous

no-u-turn-demo

comment:12 Changed 4 years ago by anonymous

File uploaded. When you change the orientation of the oneway, you see the problem. (The postion of the icon is changes and the other restriction is marked with an "*")

Changed 4 years ago by anonymous

comment:13 Changed 4 years ago by stoecker

Sorry when I was unclear. During your coding you have thought about all correct and wrong cases (at least I hope so :-). In data directory there is a file restriction.osm which is a test-file for this. Please add all possible cases there (correct ones as well as faulty ones), so the correctness of the display can be verified anytime in future.

Changed 4 years ago by dmuecke

correct u-turn signs

comment:14 Changed 4 years ago by dmuecke

Added 2 more test cases in restriction.osm (05.1 and E15).

Changed 4 years ago by dmuecke

Changed 4 years ago by dmuecke

comment:15 Changed 4 years ago by dmuecke

I've removed restriction.osm from patch file and added it as separate file called test_restriction.osm. Diff did create far too much differences making it pointless for code review.

comment:16 Changed 4 years ago by stoecker

  • Resolution set to fixed
  • Status changed from assigned to closed

(In [2087]) fixed #3306 - wrong handling of restriction via ways

comment:17 Changed 4 years ago by stoecker

Applied. Sorry, not much of your patch survived the changes I did.

comment:18 Changed 4 years ago by dmuecke

  • Resolution fixed deleted
  • Status changed from closed to reopened

No probs!
Look at E15! It shows no u turn sign wrongly.

comment:19 Changed 4 years ago by dmuecke

It shows it only in test_restriction.osm

comment:20 Changed 4 years ago by dmuecke

E12 seems also not longer working.

comment:21 Changed 4 years ago by stoecker

  • Resolution set to fixed
  • Status changed from reopened to closed

Don't know why, but you mixed "oneway=-1". Your error example is actually correct. Reversed way and -1 is the same is correctway and oneway=yes.

Regarding E13 - Display of symbols is not suppressed when the to way is affected, as this way is not required for positioning ATM. This is a strict separation between draw as best as possible and validator. I know there may be other opinions, but it is a choice done also for multipolygons and we must be consistent.

So also in the future the fact "is displayed" does still not mean "is correct". We anyway do not check all possible errors in the display routine.

comment:22 Changed 4 years ago by dmuecke

Ok, thanks for clarification.

Add Comment

Modify Ticket

Change Properties
<Author field>
Action
as closed .
as The resolution will be set. Next status will be 'closed'.
The resolution will be deleted. Next status will be 'reopened'.
Author


E-mail address and user name can be saved in the Preferences.

 
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.