Modify ↓
Opened 5 years ago
Closed 4 years ago
#1747 closed defect (fixed)
[regression] When a relation has no name and ref show note text
| Reported by: | raffourtit@… | Owned by: | framm |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | normal | Component: | Core |
| Version: | latest | Keywords: | |
| Cc: | ldp@… |
Description
When there is a number of relations having no name and ref fields it's useful to use the "note" field to show what relation is what.
Untested (even uncompiled) patch attached.
Attachments (1)
Change History (5)
Changed 5 years ago by anonymous
comment:1 Changed 4 years ago by anonymous
- Summary changed from When a relation has no name and ref show note text to [PATCH] When a relation has no name and ref show note text
comment:2 Changed 4 years ago by stoecker
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from new to closed
comment:3 Changed 4 years ago by Ldp
- Cc ldp@… added
- Priority changed from minor to normal
- Resolution fixed deleted
- Status changed from closed to reopened
- Summary changed from [PATCH] When a relation has no name and ref show note text to [regression] When a relation has no name and ref show note text
- Type changed from enhancement to defect
- Version set to latest
There is a regression on this ticket when going from JOSM 1986 to 1992. Probably in 1990.
JOSM 1992 shows "relation <id>" in the selection and relation list, when the relation has no name. It should fall back to note (or ref) in this case, instead of the generic "relation <id>".
comment:4 Changed 4 years ago by anonymous
- Resolution set to fixed
- Status changed from reopened to closed
fixed in r1997
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
patch