Modify ↓
Ticket #1747 (closed defect: fixed)
[regression] When a relation has no name and ref show note text
| Reported by: | raffourtit@… | Owned by: | framm |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | normal | Component: | Core |
| Version: | latest | Keywords: | |
| Cc: | ldp@… |
Description
When there is a number of relations having no name and ref fields it's useful to use the "note" field to show what relation is what.
Untested (even uncompiled) patch attached.
Attachments
-
josm_note.patch
(587 bytes) -
added by anonymous 3 years ago.
- patch
Change History
Changed 3 years ago by anonymous
-
attachment
josm_note.patch
added
comment:1 Changed 3 years ago by anonymous
- Summary changed from When a relation has no name and ref show note text to [PATCH] When a relation has no name and ref show note text
comment:3 Changed 2 years ago by Ldp
- Status changed from closed to reopened
- Cc ldp@… added
- Resolution fixed deleted
- Summary changed from [PATCH] When a relation has no name and ref show note text to [regression] When a relation has no name and ref show note text
- Priority changed from minor to normal
- Version set to latest
- Type changed from enhancement to defect
There is a regression on this ticket when going from JOSM 1986 to 1992. Probably in 1990.
JOSM 1992 shows "relation <id>" in the selection and relation list, when the relation has no name. It should fall back to note (or ref) in this case, instead of the generic "relation <id>".
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
patch