Opened 6 years ago
Closed 6 years ago
#15706 closed defect (fixed)
Changes to Luxembourg imagery
Reported by: | stoecker | Owned by: | Stereo |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | External imagery source | Version: | |
Keywords: | Cc: | Klumbumbus |
Description (last modified by )
Hello,
you changed the imagery page. You removed 3 dead imagery entries (no replacement anywhere?).
But you also changed the URL of another and switched from https: to http:. Why?
When possible always https: should be used.
It seems the entry should use 1-4 as switch and https:. The other one probably also should use https.
Attachments (0)
Change History (5)
comment:1 by , 6 years ago
comment:2 by , 6 years ago
Summary: | Changes to Luxembour imagery → Changes to Luxembourg imagery |
---|
So is there a replacement URL for the three insipre layers?
And what about teh switch wmts1-4?
comment:3 by , 6 years ago
There is a new wms with some cool stuff, wmts1.geoportail.lu/asis/demo, but it's currently missing a license so I haven't added it. My contact says he'll take a look soon.
If only it were that easy :). wmts1 and wmts2 are available only over http, and wmts3 and wmts4 only over https.
comment:5 by , 6 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | assigned → closed |
Fixed for JOSM. ELI not yet decided. I put the entries on our ignore list.
Stereo, if the https situation at the provider changes some day please inform here too, thanks.
Hello,
Indeed, I should have documented that, sorry. And indeed, I agree with you that https links should be used when possible.
Because of their internal infrastructure configuration, the https services of geoportail.lu don't reliably direct the clients to the same backend servers, and ssl resumption doesn't work. Since this makes the https services slower than http, I've switched to the http version.