#15643 closed defect (fixed)
Should display object ids without any separator symbol
Reported by: | naoliv | Owned by: | team |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | minor | Milestone: | 17.12 |
Component: | Core | Version: | |
Keywords: | decimal separator | Cc: |
Description
In English, if I select one node and ask to have its parents ways/relations downloaded I see this in the terminal:
The way ids are being displayed with a thousands separator.
And in pt_BR an unknown character:
Since we always use the way id without any separator symbol, the object id shouldn't be formatted as a number with separators.
JOSM:
Relative:URL: ^/trunk Repository:UUID: 0c6e7542-c601-0410-84e7-c038aed88b3b Last:Changed Date: 2017-12-05 00:58:56 +0100 (Tue, 05 Dec 2017) Revision:13194 Build-Date:2017-12-05 02:33:31 URL:http://josm.openstreetmap.de/svn/trunk Identification: JOSM/1.5 (13194 en) Linux Debian GNU/Linux testing (buster) Memory Usage: 810 MB / 7168 MB (659 MB allocated, but free) Java version: 9.0.1+11-Debian-1, Oracle Corporation, OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM Screen: :0.0 1600x900, :0.1 1280x1024 Maximum Screen Size: 1600x1024 Java package: openjdk-9-jre:amd64-9.0.1+11-1 Java ATK Wrapper package: libatk-wrapper-java:all-0.33.3-13 VM arguments: [--add-modules=java.activation,java.se.ee, -Dawt.useSystemAAFontSettings=on] Dataset consistency test: No problems found
Attachments (0)
Change History (8)
comment:1 by , 6 years ago
comment:3 by , 6 years ago
On my setup I get 2017-12-06 19:13:01.683 INFORMAÇÕES: Via 310.791.882 com 5 nós tem nós incompletos, porque pelo menos um nó estava faltando nos dados carregados.
It seems you have an encoding problem with your console.
comment:4 by , 6 years ago
Milestone: | → 17.12 |
---|
comment:5 by , 6 years ago
Strange... this dot comes from where? java or JOSM?
Maybe somewhere is using a different dot symbol?
comment:7 by , 6 years ago
It comes from Java. It must not be a standard dot as your console display them properly.
comment:8 by , 6 years ago
Keywords: | decimal separator added |
---|
OK. But what is expected separator for pt_BR? It should have displayed something correct.