Modify

Opened 9 days ago

Last modified 9 days ago

#15032 new defect

tourism node connected to a highway may be a misleading validator complaint for guideposts

Reported by: mkoniecz Owned by: team
Priority: normal Milestone:
Component: Core validator Version:
Keywords: template_report Cc:

Description

What steps will reproduce the problem?

  1. create highway=path/footway
  2. add tourism=information, information=guidepost node on the way
  3. run validator

What is the expected result?

Validator is not complaining, guideposts (especially in mountains) may be placed directly on a path

What happens instead?

Validator complains - tourism node connected to a highway (1)

Please provide any additional information below. Attach a screenshot if possible.

In attachment - one of many potential examples, found via https://duckduckgo.com/?q=drogowskaz+tatry&t=canonical&iax=1&ia=images

URL:http://josm.openstreetmap.de/svn/trunk
Repository:UUID: 0c6e7542-c601-0410-84e7-c038aed88b3b
Last:Changed Date: 2017-07-07 22:32:46 +0200 (Fri, 07 Jul 2017)
Build-Date:2017-07-08 01:32:27
Revision:12456
Relative:URL: ^/trunk

Identification: JOSM/1.5 (12456 en) Linux Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS
Memory Usage: 871 MB / 871 MB (395 MB allocated, but free)
Java version: 1.8.0_131-b11, Oracle Corporation, Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM
Screen: :0.0 1920x1080, :0.1 1366x768
Maximum Screen Size: 1920x1080
Dataset consistency test: No problems found

Last errors/warnings:
- W: java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Read timed out
- W: java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Read timed out
- W: java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Read timed out
- W: java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Read timed out
- W: No default layer selected, choosing first layer.
- W: No default layer selected, choosing first layer.
- W: java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Read timed out
- W: java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Read timed out
- W: Already here java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Read timed out
- W: java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Read timed out

Attachments (1)

random_guidepost.jpg (104.3 KB) - added by mkoniecz 9 days ago.

Download all attachments as: .zip

Change History (3)

Changed 9 days ago by mkoniecz

Attachment: random_guidepost.jpg added

comment:1 Changed 9 days ago by mkoniecz

It may be worth checking whatever this warning makes any sense - tourism=attractiom, tourism=alpine_hut also should not raise warnings.

From looking at JOSM values for tourism tag I see not even single value where this warning makes sense.

comment:2 Changed 9 days ago by mkoniecz

To explain: tourism route leading to alpine hut may involve exact mapping of path reaching alpine hut entrance. This is a valid tagging, also if alpine hut is mapped as node.

Modify Ticket

Change Properties
Set your email in Preferences
Action
as new The owner will remain team.
as The resolution will be set. Next status will be 'closed'.
to The owner will be changed from team to the specified user. Next status will be 'new'.
Next status will be 'needinfo'.The owner will change to mkoniecz
as duplicate The resolution will be set to duplicate. Next status will be 'closed'.The specified ticket will be cross-referenced with this ticket
The owner will be changed from team to anonymous. Next status will be 'assigned'.

Add Comment


E-mail address and name can be saved in the Preferences.

 
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.