changeset comment is removed at tab change

[anonymous]

open upload dialog
enter a nice comment
change to tab to create "new changeset" instead using the last open changeset
revisit first tab: nice comment is removed and the last submitted comment is shown again.

perhaps related with patch from #12367

[Don-vip]

newticket

[anonymous]

Still in latest build valid.

URL:http://josm.openstreetmap.de/svn/trunk
Repository:UUID: 0c6e7542-c601-0410-84e7-c038aed88b3b
Last:Changed Date: 2016-02-10 01:28:32 +0100 (Wed, 10 Feb 2016)
Build-Date:2016-02-10 02:33:35
Revision:9776
Relative:URL: ^/trunk

Identification: JOSM/1.5 (9776 de) Windows 7 64-Bit
Memory Usage: 247 MB / 247 MB (73 MB allocated, but free)
Java version: 1.8.0_73-b02, Oracle Corporation, Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM
VM arguments: [-Djava.security.manager, -Djava.security.policy=file:C:\Program Files (x86)\Java\jre1.8.0_73\lib\security\javaws.policy, -DtrustProxy=true, -Djnlpx.home=<java.home>\bin, -Djnlpx.origFilenameArg=C:\Program Files (x86)\josm-latest.jnlp, -Djnlpx.remove=true, -Djava.util.Arrays.useLegacyMergeSort=true, -Djnlpx.splashport=51423, -Djnlpx.jvm=<java.home>\bin\javaw.exe, -Djnlpx.vmargs=LURqYXZhLnV0aWwuQXJyYXlzLnVzZUxlZ2FjeU1lcmdlU29ydD10cnVlAA==]
Dataset consistency test: No problems found

Plugins:
- FastDraw (31895)
- FixAddresses (31772)
- Mapillary (32040)
- OpeningHoursEditor (31772)
- PicLayer (31895)
- RoadSigns (31895)
- apache-commons (31895)
- apache-http (31895)
- buildings_tools (31895)
- imagery_offset_db (32046)
- junctionchecking (31772)
- lakewalker (31772)
- log4j (31895)
- public_transport (31895)
- reltoolbox (31895)
- reverter (32005)
- terracer (31895)
- todo (29154)
- undelete (31895)
- utilsplugin2 (32018)
- waydownloader (31772)
- wikipedia (32058)

[simon04]

Closed as duplicate of #6379.

[anonymous]

No, this was no duplicate of this. I opened 6379, too.
But the problem is solved at least in the lasted build.

So thanks for changing something :-)

[simon04]

How does

But if i change the comment to "some other text" changing the changeset should NOT destroy this new text :-)

from #6379 not match this ticket's description?